18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Lassa Competus Winter 2+ vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Lassa
Competus Winter 2+
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
1
4
4
17
1
Best position
#4
#3
#2
#1
#1
Average position
4.0
12.0
3.3
1.7
1.0
Latest test
2025
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
16
111
40
80
66

Wet

Wet
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
94%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - cross
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
95%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Snow

Snow
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow handling
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Snow traction
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Snow braking
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%

Dry

Dry
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Comfort
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Exterior noise
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Costs

Costs
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison