18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Lassa Competus Winter 2+ vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Lassa
Competus Winter 2+
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
1
4
18
29
14
Best position
#4
#3
#1
#1
#1
Average position
4.0
12.0
6.1
3.7
3.6
Latest test
2025
2025
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
16
111
47
180
194

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet braking
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
94%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Wet circle cornering
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Wet handling
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
95%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Snow
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Snow traction
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Snow braking
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Snow handling
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Dry
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Dry braking
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Dry handling
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Dry performance
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Comfort
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Comfort
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Costs
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolling resistance
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store