18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Lassa Competus Winter 2+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Lassa
Competus Winter 2+
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
1
23
4
17
14
Best position
#4
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
4.0
3.3
3.3
1.7
3.6
Latest test
2025
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
16
176
40
80
194

Wet

Wet
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet braking
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
94%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Wet circle cornering
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Wet handling
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%

Snow

Snow
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Snow handling
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Snow traction
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Snow acceleration
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
99%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
97%
Snow braking
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%

Dry

Dry
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Dry performance
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Dry braking
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Dry handling
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Comfort
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%

Costs

Costs
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolling resistance
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison