18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Lassa Competus Winter 2+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Lassa
Competus Winter 2+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
1
4
4
17
14
Best position
#4
#2
#3
#1
#1
Average position
4.0
3.3
12.0
1.7
3.6
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
16
40
111
80
194

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet braking
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Wet circle cornering
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Wet handling
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Snow
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Snow traction
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Snow braking
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Snow handling
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Dry
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Dry braking
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Dry handling
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Dry performance
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Comfort
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Comfort
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Costs
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolling resistance
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store