18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Lassa Competus Winter 2+ vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Lassa
Competus Winter 2+
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
1
14
3
Best position
#4
#8
#1
Average position
4.0
13.4
1.3
Latest test
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
16
153
23

Wet

Wet
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
93%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Wet braking
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
94%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Aquaplaning - cross
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Wet circle cornering
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Wet handling
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
95%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%

Snow

Snow
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%

Dry

Dry
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Dry braking
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Dry handling
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%

Comfort

Comfort
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Comfort
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Exterior noise
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%

Costs

Costs
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Rolling resistance
Lassa Competus Winter 2+
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison