18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Landsail Winter Lander vs. Goodride SW608 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Test Profile

Landsail
Winter Lander
Goodride
SW608
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Number of tests
3
6
49
Best position
#23
#11
#1
Average position
29.0
31.5
3.2
Latest test
2025
2025
2024
Available sizes
28
66
213

Wet

Wet
Landsail Winter Lander
40%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Wet braking
Landsail Winter Lander
49%
Goodride SW608
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Aquaplaning - cross
Landsail Winter Lander
11%
Goodride SW608
39%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodride SW608
31%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%

Snow

Snow
Landsail Winter Lander
43%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Snow traction
Landsail Winter Lander
32%
Goodride SW608
39%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Snow braking
Landsail Winter Lander
49%
Goodride SW608
40%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%

Ice

Ice
Landsail Winter Lander
23%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Ice braking
Landsail Winter Lander
23%
Goodride SW608
23%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Mileage
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2021205/55 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison