18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
10
1
4
2
3
Best position
#2
#1
#2
#1
#2
Average position
12.2
1.0
3.3
2.0
3.7
Latest test
2024
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
207
66
40
48
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
82%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Snow
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
75%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
76%
Snow traction
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
74%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
81%
Snow braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
90%
Comfort
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
79%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Costs
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
73%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
84%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Offroad
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
74%
Dry
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
84%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store