18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Number of tests
10
4
3
5
24
Best position
#2
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
12.2
3.3
3.7
2.8
2.7
Latest test
2024
2026
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
207
40
36
139
302

Wet

Wet
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Wet braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Wet handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%

Snow

Snow
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Snow traction
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Snow braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
Snow handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
61%
Snow cornering
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Exterior noise
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Comfort
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Interior noise
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%

Costs

Costs
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Rolling resistance
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Mileage
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Price/value
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
83%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%

Offroad

Offroad
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Dry

Dry
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Dry braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Dry handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison