18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
10
4
49
3
Best position
#2
#2
#1
#2
Average position
12.2
3.3
3.2
3.7
Latest test
2024
2026
2024
2025
Available sizes
207
40
213
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Snow
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Snow traction
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Snow braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Snow handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Snow cornering
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Comfort
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Interior noise
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Costs
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Offroad
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
74%
Dry
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store