Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Upper-middle

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

WinterCraft WP52

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance 3

Number of tests

10

5

4

3

24

Best position

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

12.2

2.2

3.3

3.7

2.7

Latest test

2024

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

207

63

40

36

302

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Wet braking

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

78%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

77%

Wet handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

90%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

88%

Snow

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

76%

Snow traction

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Snow braking

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

Snow handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

61%

Snow cornering

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Comfort

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

91%

Exterior noise

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Comfort

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

73%

Interior noise

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

97%

Costs

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

72%

Rolling resistance

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Mileage

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

64%

Price/value

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

68%

Offroad

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Gravel traction

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

Dry

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Dry braking

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

76%

Dry handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Best tyres for EVs Best ice tyres Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs Kleber KRISALP HP3

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs Barum Polaris 5

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs Uniroyal WinterExpert

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs Michelin Primacy 5

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs Continental PremiumContact 6

Browse by brand

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

WinterCraft WP52

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison