18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
10
5
4
3
28
Best position
#2
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
12.2
2.2
3.3
3.7
2.3
Latest test
2024
2025
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
207
63
40
36
67

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Wet handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Snow
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
75%
Snow traction
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
74%
Snow braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
Comfort
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Exterior noise
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Comfort
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Interior noise
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Costs
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolling resistance
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Mileage
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Price/value
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Offroad
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Dry
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store