Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Upper-middle

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

WinterCraft WP52

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance 3

Blizzak 6

Number of tests

10

18

3

24

14

Best position

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

12.2

6.1

3.7

2.7

3.6

Latest test

2024

2025

Available sizes

207

47

36

302

194

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

80%

Wet braking

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

82%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

80%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Aquaplaning - cross

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Wet handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Wet circle cornering

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Snow

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Snow traction

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Snow braking

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

80%

Snow handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Snow cornering

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Comfort

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Exterior noise

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Comfort

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Interior noise

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

88%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

97%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Costs

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

71%

Rolling resistance

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Mileage

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

64%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

41%

Price/value

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Offroad

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Dry

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

73%

Dry braking

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

61%

Dry handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Best tyres for EVs Best ice tyres Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

VS

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Also compare

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs Kleber KRISALP HP3

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs Barum Polaris 5

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs Uniroyal WinterExpert

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato P7

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Browse by brand

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

WinterCraft WP52

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance 3

Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison