18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
3
16
4
14
1
Best position
#4
#3
#2
#1
#1
Average position
4.3
5.5
3.3
3.6
1.0
Latest test
2025
2023
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
99
153
40
194
66

Wet

Wet
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet performance
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Snow

Snow
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Snow handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Snow traction
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Snow braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Snow cornering
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%

Costs

Costs
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Price/value
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dry

Dry
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry performance
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Comfort
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Exterior noise
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison