18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. Viking Fourtech vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
Viking
Fourtech
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
9
5
4
1
5
Best position
#5
#11
#2
#1
#1
Average position
10.8
17.0
3.3
1.0
2.2
Latest test
2023
2021
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
73
32
40
66
63

Wet

Wet
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
67%
Viking Fourtech
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
71%
Viking Fourtech
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet handling
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
70%
Viking Fourtech
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
68%
Viking Fourtech
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
61%
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
62%
Viking Fourtech
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%

Snow

Snow
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
71%
Viking Fourtech
71%
Snow braking
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
81%
Viking Fourtech
82%
Snow cornering
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
58%
Viking Fourtech
67%
Snow handling
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
67%
Viking Fourtech
71%
Snow traction
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
72%
Viking Fourtech
51%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
76%
Viking Fourtech
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
80%
Viking Fourtech
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Costs

Costs
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
65%
Viking Fourtech
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Mileage
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
70%
Viking Fourtech
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Price/value
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
83%
Viking Fourtech
77%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Rolling resistance
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
59%
Viking Fourtech
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%

Dry

Dry
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
68%
Viking Fourtech
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry handling
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
73%
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Dry braking
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
63%
Viking Fourtech
47%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison