18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. Viking Fourtech vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
Viking
Fourtech
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
9
5
4
6
3
5
Best position
#5
#11
#2
#3
#2
#1
Average position
10.8
17.0
3.3
4.7
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2023
2021
2026
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
73
32
40
146
36
63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
67%
Viking Fourtech
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
68%
Viking Fourtech
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
61%
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
71%
Viking Fourtech
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet handling
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
70%
Viking Fourtech
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
62%
Viking Fourtech
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Snow
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
71%
Viking Fourtech
71%
Comfort
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
76%
Viking Fourtech
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
80%
Viking Fourtech
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Costs
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
65%
Viking Fourtech
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Price/value
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
83%
Viking Fourtech
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Mileage
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
70%
Viking Fourtech
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Rolling resistance
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
59%
Viking Fourtech
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Dry
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
68%
Viking Fourtech
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
63%
Viking Fourtech
47%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
73%
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store