Comparison: Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. Firestone Multiseason 2 vs. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs. Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2 vs. BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 vs. Nokian Seasonproof vs. Kormoran All Season

The comparison between the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S and the Firestone Multiseason 2 car tyres highlights unique strengths and weaknesses of each model. Taking manufactured location into account, Kumho HA32 is made in China while Firestone Multiseason is made in Italy.

According to our rankings, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S received a rating of 73% due to its excellent noise levels and great performance in snow braking and mileage. In terms of price/value, it also scores high. However, tire tests have shown it to have mediocre aquaplaning reserves and slightly extended wet/dry braking distances. Its rolling resistance is also higher than ideal.

On the other hand, the Firestone Multiseason 2 scored slightly lower with a rating of 67%. It has proven to offer stable driving behaviour on snow and wet tracks, and boasts a pleasantly low rolling resistance. Drawbacks include average aquaplaning qualities, understeering snow, and dry handling as well as a rather limited mileage.

In a test conducted by Autobild, out of 32 tyres, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S secured the 10th spot while the Firestone Multiseason 2 climbed to the sixth position. Firestone's strong points are its rolling resistance and price/value ratio, along with the solid snow traction. In comparison, Kumho's additional strengths lie in its exterior noise and price/value.

In conclusion, based on mutual test positions, the Firestone Multiseason 2 performed relatively better than the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S. Both tyres exhibit their own admirable qualities along with some weaknesses. This makes the final decision depend largely on the specific requirements of the user.

Learn more about Kumho and Firestone tyres from their respective manufacturer's page at Kumho and Firestone.