18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Nokian Powerproof vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

The Kumho Ecsta HS52 and the Vredestein ULTRAC are two notable summer tyres that deliver different performances across their respective fields. Each of these tyres have their strengths and offer an all-round performance under various conditions.


A successor to the Kumho Ecsta HS51, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 secures an impressive 81% rating from our test. This is in part due to its excellent performance on both wet and dry surfaces, dependable mileage and wet circle cornering. With a focus on dry handling, braking, and price-value ratio, this tyre excels in the Autobild and ADAC tests. However, its Aquaplaning feature may need further improvements for an even better performance.


Flipping the coin, the Vredestein ULTRAC scores strikingly well on dry and wet surfaces, showing minimal chances of Aquaplaning. It shows its prowess in the Autoklub ČR test, where it ranks 7th out of 19 tyres tested. Plus points to this Vredestein's model are secured by its excellent wet handling, short dry braking distances and powerful Aquaplaning resistance. However, an increased rolling resistance and external noise along with a lesser mileage compared to the Kumho Ecsta HS52 mark it down slightly in our test ratings, garnering a 42% overall.


Though the Vredestein ULTRAC shows a strong suit in wet conditions, the Kumho Ecsta HS51 pulls ahead with a better overall performance. Plus, its superior mileage and price-value ratio make the Kumho's model a clear winner in the overall performance, retaining its worthiness among touring tyres.


To sum up, both the Kumho Ecsta HS52 and Vredestein ULTRAC deliver excellent dry and wet handling respectively. They prove to be durable and are efficient for long drives. If mileage and price-value ratio are a priority, then the Kumho Ecsta HS52 proves to be a safer bet. Meanwhile, the Vredestein ULTRAC's excellent wet handling and Aquaplaning resistance make it a strong competitor. Choosing between these tyres would mostly depend on the user's preference and driving conditions.

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Nokian
Powerproof
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Number of tests
10
11
18
Best position
#2
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
7.5
6.1
Latest test
2026
2022
2024
Available sizes
104
53
47

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
87%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Nokian Powerproof
82%
Nokian
Powerproof
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Wet Braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
88%
Vredestein ULTRAC
96%
Nokian Powerproof
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Wet Handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Vredestein ULTRAC
88%
Nokian Powerproof
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Wet Circle Cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Vredestein ULTRAC
79%
Nokian Powerproof
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
88%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Vredestein ULTRAC
86%
Nokian Powerproof
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
66%
Aquaplaning Cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
60%
Vredestein ULTRAC
87%
Nokian Powerproof
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Dry Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
77%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Nokian Powerproof
75%
Nokian
Powerproof
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Dry Braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
90%
Vredestein ULTRAC
79%
Nokian Powerproof
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Dry Handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
67%
Vredestein ULTRAC
75%
Nokian Powerproof
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Comfort & Noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
67%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Nokian Powerproof
62%
Nokian
Powerproof
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Noise Exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Vredestein ULTRAC
57%
Nokian Powerproof
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Ride Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Vredestein ULTRAC
76%
Nokian Powerproof
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
86%
Economy
Kumho Ecsta HS52
64%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
49%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Nokian Powerproof
49%
Nokian
Powerproof
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
96%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Rolling Resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
59%
Vredestein ULTRAC
59%
Nokian Powerproof
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Vredestein ULTRAC
38%
Nokian Powerproof
38%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2022215/55 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison