18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

The Kumho Ecsta HS52 and the Vredestein ULTRAC are two notable summer tyres that deliver different performances across their respective fields. Each of these tyres have their strengths and offer an all-round performance under various conditions.


A successor to the Kumho Ecsta HS51, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 secures an impressive 81% rating from our test. This is in part due to its excellent performance on both wet and dry surfaces, dependable mileage and wet circle cornering. With a focus on dry handling, braking, and price-value ratio, this tyre excels in the Autobild and ADAC tests. However, its Aquaplaning feature may need further improvements for an even better performance.


Flipping the coin, the Vredestein ULTRAC scores strikingly well on dry and wet surfaces, showing minimal chances of Aquaplaning. It shows its prowess in the Autoklub ČR test, where it ranks 7th out of 19 tyres tested. Plus points to this Vredestein's model are secured by its excellent wet handling, short dry braking distances and powerful Aquaplaning resistance. However, an increased rolling resistance and external noise along with a lesser mileage compared to the Kumho Ecsta HS52 mark it down slightly in our test ratings, garnering a 42% overall.


Though the Vredestein ULTRAC shows a strong suit in wet conditions, the Kumho Ecsta HS51 pulls ahead with a better overall performance. Plus, its superior mileage and price-value ratio make the Kumho's model a clear winner in the overall performance, retaining its worthiness among touring tyres.


To sum up, both the Kumho Ecsta HS52 and Vredestein ULTRAC deliver excellent dry and wet handling respectively. They prove to be durable and are efficient for long drives. If mileage and price-value ratio are a priority, then the Kumho Ecsta HS52 proves to be a safer bet. Meanwhile, the Vredestein ULTRAC's excellent wet handling and Aquaplaning resistance make it a strong competitor. Choosing between these tyres would mostly depend on the user's preference and driving conditions.

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
10
5
18
3
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#2
Average position
6.0
2.2
6.1
3.3
Latest test
2026
2025
2024
2026
Available sizes
104
63
47
40

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Vredestein ULTRAC
93%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Vredestein ULTRAC
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Vredestein ULTRAC
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Vredestein ULTRAC
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Vredestein ULTRAC
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Vredestein ULTRAC
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Interior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Vredestein ULTRAC
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Vredestein ULTRAC
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Vredestein ULTRAC
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Vredestein ULTRAC
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Vredestein ULTRAC
56%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Vredestein ULTRAC
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Vredestein ULTRAC
29%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison