18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun vs. Nokian Powerproof

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

The Kumho Ecsta HS52 and the Vredestein ULTRAC are two notable summer tyres that deliver different performances across their respective fields. Each of these tyres have their strengths and offer an all-round performance under various conditions.


A successor to the Kumho Ecsta HS51, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 secures an impressive 81% rating from our test. This is in part due to its excellent performance on both wet and dry surfaces, dependable mileage and wet circle cornering. With a focus on dry handling, braking, and price-value ratio, this tyre excels in the Autobild and ADAC tests. However, its Aquaplaning feature may need further improvements for an even better performance.


Flipping the coin, the Vredestein ULTRAC scores strikingly well on dry and wet surfaces, showing minimal chances of Aquaplaning. It shows its prowess in the Autoklub ČR test, where it ranks 7th out of 19 tyres tested. Plus points to this Vredestein's model are secured by its excellent wet handling, short dry braking distances and powerful Aquaplaning resistance. However, an increased rolling resistance and external noise along with a lesser mileage compared to the Kumho Ecsta HS52 mark it down slightly in our test ratings, garnering a 42% overall.


Though the Vredestein ULTRAC shows a strong suit in wet conditions, the Kumho Ecsta HS51 pulls ahead with a better overall performance. Plus, its superior mileage and price-value ratio make the Kumho's model a clear winner in the overall performance, retaining its worthiness among touring tyres.


To sum up, both the Kumho Ecsta HS52 and Vredestein ULTRAC deliver excellent dry and wet handling respectively. They prove to be durable and are efficient for long drives. If mileage and price-value ratio are a priority, then the Kumho Ecsta HS52 proves to be a safer bet. Meanwhile, the Vredestein ULTRAC's excellent wet handling and Aquaplaning resistance make it a strong competitor. Choosing between these tyres would mostly depend on the user's preference and driving conditions.

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Nokian
Powerproof
Number of tests
10
23
11
Best position
#2
#2
#2
Average position
6.0
6.6
7.5
Latest test
2026
2025
2022
Available sizes
104
194
53

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
87%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
87%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Nokian Powerproof
82%
Nokian
Powerproof
Wet Braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
88%
Vredestein ULTRAC
96%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
96%
Nokian Powerproof
88%
Wet Handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Vredestein ULTRAC
88%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
71%
Nokian Powerproof
88%
Wet Circle Cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Vredestein ULTRAC
79%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
88%
Nokian Powerproof
79%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Vredestein ULTRAC
86%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
95%
Nokian Powerproof
86%
Aquaplaning Cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
60%
Vredestein ULTRAC
87%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
87%
Nokian Powerproof
69%
Dry Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
77%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
82%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Nokian Powerproof
75%
Nokian
Powerproof
Dry Braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
90%
Vredestein ULTRAC
79%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
79%
Nokian Powerproof
90%
Dry Handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
67%
Vredestein ULTRAC
75%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
84%
Nokian Powerproof
59%
Comfort & Noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
67%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
81%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Nokian Powerproof
62%
Nokian
Powerproof
Noise Exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Vredestein ULTRAC
57%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Nokian Powerproof
57%
Ride Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Vredestein ULTRAC
76%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
86%
Nokian Powerproof
66%
Economy
Kumho Ecsta HS52
64%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
49%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
52%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Nokian Powerproof
49%
Nokian
Powerproof
Rolling Resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
59%
Vredestein ULTRAC
59%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
42%
Nokian Powerproof
59%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Vredestein ULTRAC
38%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
61%
Nokian Powerproof
38%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2022215/55 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison