18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

In this review, we will be comparing two popular touring summer tyres: the Kumho Ecsta HS52 and the Michelin Primacy 4+. Both tyres have a strong pedigree in the tyre market, with the Kumho Ecsta HS52 coming from a line of successful previous models, the last being the Kumho Ecsta HS51 while the Michelin Primacy 4+ follows the Michelin Primacy 4 and Michelin Primacy 3.


The Kumho Ecsta HS52, manufactured by Kumho, impresses with an overall rating of 78%. In tests, the HS52 performs particularly well in dry handling, dry braking, and wet braking. Autobild also authoritative commended the tyre for convincing performance on wet and dry surfaces, short braking distances, and its economical price. Some points of minor drawbacks include a mediocre roll-off comfort (Autobild 2024) and slight weaknesses in aquaplaning behaviour (ADAC 2024). However, its good predicted mileage and low fuel consumption make up for these minor quibbles.


Turning to the Michelin Primacy 4+, from the renowned Michelin manufacturer, this tyre boasts a solid overall rating of 77%. Test results highlight its excellent exterior noise reduction and balanced high performance. The tyre also exhibits superior handling qualities, short dry braking distances, excellent mileage, and efficiency (Autobild 2024). ADAC 2024 also appreciated its balanced riding properties on both dry and wet surfaces and its low weight and fuel consumption, but slight aquaplaning weaknesses were also noted.


In head-to-head tests, these tyres fared closely. In the Vibilagare, Autobild, ADAC, and Autoklub ČR tests, Kumho Ecsta HS52 achieved positions of 3rd, 2nd, 8th, and 13th respectively out of 9, 55, 50, and 19 tested tyres. In contrast, the Michelin Primacy 4+ placed at 7th, 5th, 3rd, and 2nd in the same tests, showing a generally better performance.


In conclusion, while both tyres show great strengths in dry and wet handling, braking distances, and fuel efficiency, the Michelin Primacy 4+ pulls ahead in tests, courtesy of its excellent performance properties, superb mileage, and low exterior noise. The Kumho Ecsta HS52, on the other hand, stands out as an economical option, providing balanced performance at a competitive price.

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
10
13
2
Best position
#2
#1
#1
Average position
6.0
4.3
1.0
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
104
123
23

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison