18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Today, we will be comparing two popular summer tyres, Kumho Ecsta HS52 by Kumho Tire and Firestone Roadhawk by Firestone. These tyres have been tested extensively, and our verdict takes into account data from countless tests.


The Kumho Ecsta HS52 scored impressively in our rating, boasting 78%. This tyre has a rich pedigree, following its successful predecessor, the Kumho Ecsta HS51. In the Autobild test, the HS52 ranked high in 3rd position among 51 tested tyres. Its strength lies in dry braking and dry handling, with additional commendations in price and value. However, slight weaknesses were found in terms of efficiency and sustainability, and its environmental impact could use some improvements.


On the other hand, the Firestone Roadhawk received a rating of 59% from our team. This tyre shows strengths in dry roadway efficiency and less tyre wear, making a positive impact on its environmental rating. One of the downsides, however, is that it didn't perform well in wet conditions, affecting its overall ranking in the Autobild test, securing the lowly 30th position.


When compared directly in mutual test positions across various platforms, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 comes out on top. For instance, the HS52 was ranked 13th in the Autoklub ČR test while the Roadhawk was ranked 11th. Furthermore, in the autobild 2022 test, the HS52 was praised for its new summer profile with balanced performance potential, short wet and dry braking distances, and good comfort. However, it was criticised for slightly sluggish steering response.


In conclusion, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 appears to outperform the Firestone Roadhawk in overall test data, largely owing to its superior dry handling and braking, as well as its cost-effectiveness. The Firestone Roadhawk, while efficient and light, shows weaknesses in wet conditions that affect its ranking negatively.


Both tyres have their merits and areas for improvement, and the choice will depend on your individual driving conditions and priorities. Stay tuned for more in-depth tyre reviews and comparisons.

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk
Pirelli
Cinturato P7 C2
Number of tests
10
21
9
Best position
#2
#2
#2
Average position
6.0
11.9
5.8
Latest test
2026
2024
2025
Available sizes
104
164
92

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone Roadhawk
87%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
86%
Pirelli
Cinturato P7 C2
Wet Braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
53%
Firestone Roadhawk
65%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
81%
Wet Handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
94%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
94%
Wet Circle Cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
90%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
90%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
94%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
87%
Aquaplaning Cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
52%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
76%
Dry Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
95%
Pirelli
Cinturato P7 C2
Dry Braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
89%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
96%
Dry Handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
86%
Firestone Roadhawk
81%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
93%
Comfort & Noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
94%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone Roadhawk
93%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
97%
Pirelli
Cinturato P7 C2
Noise Exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
94%
Firestone Roadhawk
93%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
97%
Economy
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
65%
Pirelli
Cinturato P7 C2
Rolling Resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
65%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
Autoklub ČRAutoklub ČR
Summer
2023205/55 R16View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison