18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Today, we will be comparing two popular summer tyres, Kumho Ecsta HS52 by Kumho Tire and Firestone Roadhawk by Firestone. These tyres have been tested extensively, and our verdict takes into account data from countless tests.


The Kumho Ecsta HS52 scored impressively in our rating, boasting 78%. This tyre has a rich pedigree, following its successful predecessor, the Kumho Ecsta HS51. In the Autobild test, the HS52 ranked high in 3rd position among 51 tested tyres. Its strength lies in dry braking and dry handling, with additional commendations in price and value. However, slight weaknesses were found in terms of efficiency and sustainability, and its environmental impact could use some improvements.


On the other hand, the Firestone Roadhawk received a rating of 59% from our team. This tyre shows strengths in dry roadway efficiency and less tyre wear, making a positive impact on its environmental rating. One of the downsides, however, is that it didn't perform well in wet conditions, affecting its overall ranking in the Autobild test, securing the lowly 30th position.


When compared directly in mutual test positions across various platforms, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 comes out on top. For instance, the HS52 was ranked 13th in the Autoklub ČR test while the Roadhawk was ranked 11th. Furthermore, in the autobild 2022 test, the HS52 was praised for its new summer profile with balanced performance potential, short wet and dry braking distances, and good comfort. However, it was criticised for slightly sluggish steering response.


In conclusion, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 appears to outperform the Firestone Roadhawk in overall test data, largely owing to its superior dry handling and braking, as well as its cost-effectiveness. The Firestone Roadhawk, while efficient and light, shows weaknesses in wet conditions that affect its ranking negatively.


Both tyres have their merits and areas for improvement, and the choice will depend on your individual driving conditions and priorities. Stay tuned for more in-depth tyre reviews and comparisons.

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
10
21
3
Best position
#2
#2
#2
Average position
6.0
11.9
3.3
Latest test
2026
2024
2026
Available sizes
104
164
60

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Interior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison