18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

Today, we will be comparing two popular summer tyres, Kumho Ecsta HS52 by Kumho Tire and Firestone Roadhawk by Firestone. These tyres have been tested extensively, and our verdict takes into account data from countless tests.


The Kumho Ecsta HS52 scored impressively in our rating, boasting 78%. This tyre has a rich pedigree, following its successful predecessor, the Kumho Ecsta HS51. In the Autobild test, the HS52 ranked high in 3rd position among 51 tested tyres. Its strength lies in dry braking and dry handling, with additional commendations in price and value. However, slight weaknesses were found in terms of efficiency and sustainability, and its environmental impact could use some improvements.


On the other hand, the Firestone Roadhawk received a rating of 59% from our team. This tyre shows strengths in dry roadway efficiency and less tyre wear, making a positive impact on its environmental rating. One of the downsides, however, is that it didn't perform well in wet conditions, affecting its overall ranking in the Autobild test, securing the lowly 30th position.


When compared directly in mutual test positions across various platforms, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 comes out on top. For instance, the HS52 was ranked 13th in the Autoklub ČR test while the Roadhawk was ranked 11th. Furthermore, in the autobild 2022 test, the HS52 was praised for its new summer profile with balanced performance potential, short wet and dry braking distances, and good comfort. However, it was criticised for slightly sluggish steering response.


In conclusion, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 appears to outperform the Firestone Roadhawk in overall test data, largely owing to its superior dry handling and braking, as well as its cost-effectiveness. The Firestone Roadhawk, while efficient and light, shows weaknesses in wet conditions that affect its ranking negatively.


Both tyres have their merits and areas for improvement, and the choice will depend on your individual driving conditions and priorities. Stay tuned for more in-depth tyre reviews and comparisons.

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Number of tests
10
21
18
3
33
Best position
#2
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
11.9
6.1
3.3
4.1
Latest test
2026
2024
2024
2026
2025
Available sizes
104
164
47
40
658

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Wet performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
76%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
62%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
66%
Interior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Dry performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
93%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
53%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison