18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

3 mutual test(s) with detailed data

We have gathered data from various tests to compare the Kumho Ecsta HS52 and the Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun summer touring tyres. Our goal is to deliver a comprehensive overview of two well-known options amongst drivers: the flagship model from Kumho and the popular choice from Falken.


The Kumho Ecsta HS52, which replaced the previous model Kumho Ecsta HS51, has garnered an impressive rating of 78%. According to various tests, it performs exceptionally well in dry braking, dry handling, wet braking and price/value factors. It has also managed to nab third place in the test comparison of 51 tyres conducted by Autobild, by displaying convincing performances on both wet and dry tracks and offering short brake distances on both surfaces. Despite its slightly moderate rolling comfort, the low fuel consumption and environmental efficiency make it a reliable contender.


The Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, on the other hand, boasts a substantial rating of 75%. When pitted against other tyres by Vibilagare and Autobild, it has managed to secure fourth and fifth places respectively. The tyre is well-regarded for its dry handling, strong performance against aquaplaning, and comfort. Despite slightly restricted mileage and a bit higher rolling resistance, several tests have highlighted its security reserves for aquaplaning and dynamic dry handling as some of its best features.


When compared side by side, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 emerges with an overall edge due to its better test rating and more consistent performance across various parameters. However, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun doesn’t fall far behind, delivering solid performances in specific areas like dry handling and resistance to aquaplaning. Furthermore, the Falken tyre seems to excel considerably when it comes to comfort and aquaplaning performance.


To sum up, both tyres are solid choices for a summer touring tyre, each with their own strengths. While the Kumho Ecsta HS52 excels in terms of balancing both wet and dry performance along with great value for money, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun shines with its dry handling and aquaplaning resistance capabilities. Therefore, the ultimate decision would depend on your individual preference and driving conditions.

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Number of tests
10
23
18
Best position
#2
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
6.6
6.1
Latest test
2026
2025
2024
Available sizes
104
194
47

Performance comparison

Averaged from 3 tests

Wet Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Wet Braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
61%
Wet Handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Wet Circle Cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
82%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning Cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
61%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
80%
Dry Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
83%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
78%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
65%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Dry Braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
82%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Dry Handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
84%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
54%
Comfort & Noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
70%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Noise Exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
62%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Noise Interior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Ride Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
86%
Economy
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
59%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
96%
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Rolling Resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2024205/55 R16View
ADACADAC
Summer
2024215/55 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2022215/55 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison