18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Falken e.Ziex

When comparing the Kumho Ecsta HS52 and the Continental PremiumContact 7 tyres, it's evident that both models provide some commendable features, though there is also some differentiation in their performance according to numerous tests. The Kumho Ecsta HS52 and Continental PremiumContact 7 are both suitable for summer and are of the touring subtype. Continental, known for their quality products, crafted PremiumContact 7 in multiple factories across Europe while the origin of the HS52 by Kumho has not been specified.


The Kumho Ecsta HS52 got an overall rating of 78% and can be a great choice for its excellent dry handling and short dry braking distances. Multiple test results highlighted its performance in terms of dry braking, dry handling and wet circle cornering. Autobild praised the HS52 for its convincing performance on both wet and dry surfaces along with its reasonable price. However, according to Autobild, the tyre could improve its rolling comfort.


On the other hand, the Continental PremiumContact 7 carries a commendable rating of 99%, and it topped the list in some tests. Besides its excellent dry braking, wet braking, and wet circle cornering, it also provides comfortable driving according to ADAC and Autoklub ČR. Autobild has lauded the PremiumContact 7 for its exemplary performance on both dry and wet surfaces. Additionally, its dry braking, dry handling, and wet handling were very positively assessed in several tests. On the downside, the PremiumContact 7 had an average rolling resistance, aquaplaning resistance and increased external noise, as per TyreReviews.com.


The earlier version of Kumho Ecsta HS52 was Kumho Ecsta HS51 whereas the Continental PremiumContact 7 is the successor of Continental PremiumContact 6 and Continental ContiPremiumContact 5.


While both tyres have their strengths and weaknesses, overall test results indicate the Continental PremiumContact 7 tyre outperforms the Kumho Ecsta HS52 in most areas, although the latter delivers noticeable performance according to its price range. Make sure to consider specific needs and preferences when choosing between these two summer touring tyre models.

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
10
26
3
Best position
#2
#1
#2
Average position
6.0
2.2
3.7
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
104
66
34

Wet

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Costs

Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison