18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6

3 mutual test(s) with detailed data

When comparing the Kumho Ecsta HS52 and the Continental PremiumContact 7 tyres, it's evident that both models provide some commendable features, though there is also some differentiation in their performance according to numerous tests. The Kumho Ecsta HS52 and Continental PremiumContact 7 are both suitable for summer and are of the touring subtype. Continental, known for their quality products, crafted PremiumContact 7 in multiple factories across Europe while the origin of the HS52 by Kumho has not been specified.


The Kumho Ecsta HS52 got an overall rating of 78% and can be a great choice for its excellent dry handling and short dry braking distances. Multiple test results highlighted its performance in terms of dry braking, dry handling and wet circle cornering. Autobild praised the HS52 for its convincing performance on both wet and dry surfaces along with its reasonable price. However, according to Autobild, the tyre could improve its rolling comfort.


On the other hand, the Continental PremiumContact 7 carries a commendable rating of 99%, and it topped the list in some tests. Besides its excellent dry braking, wet braking, and wet circle cornering, it also provides comfortable driving according to ADAC and Autoklub ČR. Autobild has lauded the PremiumContact 7 for its exemplary performance on both dry and wet surfaces. Additionally, its dry braking, dry handling, and wet handling were very positively assessed in several tests. On the downside, the PremiumContact 7 had an average rolling resistance, aquaplaning resistance and increased external noise, as per TyreReviews.com.


The earlier version of Kumho Ecsta HS52 was Kumho Ecsta HS51 whereas the Continental PremiumContact 7 is the successor of Continental PremiumContact 6 and Continental ContiPremiumContact 5.


While both tyres have their strengths and weaknesses, overall test results indicate the Continental PremiumContact 7 tyre outperforms the Kumho Ecsta HS52 in most areas, although the latter delivers noticeable performance according to its price range. Make sure to consider specific needs and preferences when choosing between these two summer touring tyre models.

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Bridgestone
Turanza 6
Number of tests
10
26
13
Best position
#2
#1
#2
Average position
6.0
2.2
6.2
Latest test
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
104
66
225

Performance comparison

Averaged from 3 tests

Wet Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Bridgestone Turanza 6
68%
Bridgestone
Turanza 6
Wet Braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
53%
Wet Handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
56%
Wet Circle Cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
72%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
65%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
88%
Aquaplaning Cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
62%
Continental PremiumContact 7
58%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
70%
Dry Performance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
86%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%
Bridgestone
Turanza 6
Dry Braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%
Dry Handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%
Comfort & Noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Bridgestone Turanza 6
82%
Bridgestone
Turanza 6
Noise Exterior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
64%
Noise Interior
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
82%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
100%
Economy
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental PremiumContact 7
78%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Bridgestone Turanza 6
75%
Bridgestone
Turanza 6
Rolling Resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
75%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
74%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2026225/50 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2024205/55 R16View
ADACADAC
Summer
2024215/55 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison