18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Number of tests
10
14
4
3
24
Best position
#2
#8
#2
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
13.4
3.3
3.7
2.7
Latest test
2026
2026
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
109
153
40
36
151

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Comfort
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%
Interior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
Dry
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Costs
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Price/value
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store