Segment
1. Pirelli Cinturato P7 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs. Pirelli Cinturato P7
Table of contents:
| # | Kumho Ecsta HS51
| Pirelli Cinturato P7
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Kumho Ecsta HS51 vs Pirelli Cinturato P7 — summer tyre comparison and test summary
This comparison reviews test results from ADAC, Teknikens Värld and Autozeitung to show how the Kumho Ecsta HS51 stacks up against the Pirelli Cinturato P7. For manufacturer information visit Kumho’s site (Kumho) and Pirelli’s summer tyre page (Pirelli).
Note: the Kumho Ecsta HS51 has been replaced by the Kumho Ecsta HS52 — consider the HS52 as the modern alternative when making a purchase decision.
How they performed across tests
- ADAC (12 tyres): Pirelli finished 4th, Kumho 10th. ADAC highlighted the Pirelli for noise control, dry braking and dry driving behaviour, while Kumho scored on exterior noise, aquaplaning tests and fuel efficiency.
- Teknikens Värld (10 tyres): Pirelli 5th (noted for wet handling), Kumho 7th (aquaplaning-longitudinal strength).
- Autozeitung (10 tyres): Pirelli 4th (comfort highlighted), Kumho 9th (again aquaplaning-longitudinal recognized).
Summary of strengths and weaknesses
- Pirelli Cinturato P7 — strengths: Consistently higher placements across independent tests, with clear advantages in dry braking, dry driving behaviour, comfort and noise levels. ADAC also flags Pirelli for safety-related performance and longitudinal aquaplaning resistance. Overall the P7 is a well-balanced summer tyre that performs strongly in both dry and wet conditions.
- Pirelli Cinturato P7 — weaknesses: In the provided test set there are no major weaknesses called out — the tyre’s lower (but still competitive) positions in Teknikens indicate other premium competitors can edge it slightly in some wet scenarios, but Pirelli remains among the better performers.
- Kumho Ecsta HS51 — strengths: Repeatedly highlighted for aquaplaning resistance (longitudinal and cross), low exterior noise and respectable fuel efficiency. These attributes make the HS51 a competent option for wet-weather stability and economical running.
- Kumho Ecsta HS51 — weaknesses: Despite those specific strengths, the HS51 finishes toward the back of the field in these tests (positions 7–10), indicating weaker overall balance — notably less competitive in dry braking, dry handling and comfort compared with the Pirelli.
Overall verdict — which tyre is better?
Across the three mutual tests the Pirelli Cinturato P7 outperforms the Kumho Ecsta HS51 in overall rankings and in key everyday performance metrics (dry braking, handling, noise and comfort). The P7 is the better all-round choice for drivers prioritizing balanced wet/dry performance and comfort. The HS51 shows targeted strengths in aquaplaning and efficiency and may appeal as a value-focused alternative, but it trails the Pirelli in overall test results. If you were considering the HS51, also check the successor Kumho Ecsta HS52 for updated performance.
For full model details and specifications visit the tyre pages: Kumho Ecsta HS51 and Pirelli Cinturato P7.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Exemplary2. Pirelli Cinturato P7 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS51 Satisfactory2. Pirelli Cinturato P7 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet performance
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry driving behavior
Dry performance
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
4
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,4 | 2,7 | 0,6 | |||
| Kumho Ecsta HS51 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,2 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 2,0 | |||
| Pirelli Cinturato P7 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,0 | 2,0 | 2,7 | 3,0 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 61 | 11 | 12 | 1 | 6 | ||
| Kumho Ecsta HS51 | 45 | 24 | 13 | 2 | 6 | ||
| Pirelli Cinturato P7 | 57 | 24 | 17 | 9 | 7 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,2 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Kumho Ecsta HS51 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,2 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,5 | ||
| Pirelli Cinturato P7 Rating: Recommended | 2,4 | 1,7 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 277 | 142 | 135 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS51 | 181 | 73 | 108 | ||||
| Pirelli Cinturato P7 Rating: - | 242 | 123 | 119 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
