18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Kleber
Quadraxer 3
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
13
4
1
3
28
Best position
#4
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
6.3
3.3
1.0
3.7
2.3
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
116
40
66
36
68

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Kleber Quadraxer 3
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet handling
Kleber Quadraxer 3
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Quadraxer 3
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Wet braking
Kleber Quadraxer 3
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Quadraxer 3
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Quadraxer 3
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Snow
Confidence
Kleber Quadraxer 3
88%
Snow handling
Kleber Quadraxer 3
90%
Snow traction
Kleber Quadraxer 3
86%
Snow braking
Kleber Quadraxer 3
87%
Snow cornering
Kleber Quadraxer 3
87%
Dry
Confidence
Kleber Quadraxer 3
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry handling
Kleber Quadraxer 3
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Dry braking
Kleber Quadraxer 3
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Costs
Confidence
Kleber Quadraxer 3
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Quadraxer 3
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Price/value
Kleber Quadraxer 3
66%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Mileage
Kleber Quadraxer 3
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Comfort
Confidence
Kleber Quadraxer 3
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Exterior noise
Kleber Quadraxer 3
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Comfort
Kleber Quadraxer 3
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store