Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Petlas Imperium PT515 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

When looking for summer tyres, customers often compare the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 and the Petlas Imperium PT515. To simplify your decision, we have analyzed both tyres based on their performances in several tests.

From our own testing, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 achieved a rating of 76%, noticeably ahead of the Petlas Imperium PT515 which scored 48%. However, these numbers alone do not show the full picture.

In the Autobild and ADAC tests, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 outperformed the Petlas Imperium PT515 by achieving better positions. The Kleber came out 14th and 12th, while the Petlas lagged behind at 35th and 30th.

In addition to the ranking, each tyre has its unique strengths and weaknesses. The Kleber Dynaxer HP4 was lauded for its comfort, exterior noise and good performance in eco-balance, mileage, wear, and efficiency. On the negative side, it has inconsistencies, with weaknesses on wet roads and slow steering response.

The Petlas Imperium PT515, on the other hand, was positively noted for high mileage and low wear. It, however, was less balanced, with clear weaknesses on wet and dry roads, a heavier than average weight and hampered sustainability scores.

In summary, Kleber Dynaxer HP4, made by Kleber is a more balanced tyre, outperforming the Petlas Imperium PT515, produced by Petlas, in most tests and parameters. If you favour comfort and eco-balance in your driving, Kleber is the more favourable choice. However, If mileage and low wear are your priority, you might want to consider Petlas. Nevertheless, Petlas' performance on both wet and dry roads needs to be improved for a more balanced overall product.