18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Petlas Imperium PT515 vs. Fulda EcoControl HP2

When looking for summer tyres, customers often compare the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 and the Petlas Imperium PT515. To simplify your decision, we have analyzed both tyres based on their performances in several tests.


From our own testing, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 achieved a rating of 76%, noticeably ahead of the Petlas Imperium PT515 which scored 48%. However, these numbers alone do not show the full picture.


In the Autobild and ADAC tests, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 outperformed the Petlas Imperium PT515 by achieving better positions. The Kleber came out 14th and 12th, while the Petlas lagged behind at 35th and 30th.


In addition to the ranking, each tyre has its unique strengths and weaknesses. The Kleber Dynaxer HP4 was lauded for its comfort, exterior noise and good performance in eco-balance, mileage, wear, and efficiency. On the negative side, it has inconsistencies, with weaknesses on wet roads and slow steering response.


The Petlas Imperium PT515, on the other hand, was positively noted for high mileage and low wear. It, however, was less balanced, with clear weaknesses on wet and dry roads, a heavier than average weight and hampered sustainability scores.


In summary, Kleber Dynaxer HP4, made by Kleber is a more balanced tyre, outperforming the Petlas Imperium PT515, produced by Petlas, in most tests and parameters. If you favour comfort and eco-balance in your driving, Kleber is the more favourable choice. However, If mileage and low wear are your priority, you might want to consider Petlas. Nevertheless, Petlas' performance on both wet and dry roads needs to be improved for a more balanced overall product.

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Petlas
Imperium PT515
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Number of tests
11
5
8
Best position
#1
#13
#4
Average position
11.6
24.0
12.8
Latest test
2024
2024
2024
Available sizes
121
11
30

Wet

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Petlas Imperium PT515
54%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
65%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Petlas Imperium PT515
66%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Petlas Imperium PT515
71%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Petlas Imperium PT515
55%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
63%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Petlas Imperium PT515
30%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
62%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Petlas Imperium PT515
60%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Petlas Imperium PT515
46%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
74%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Petlas Imperium PT515
63%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
78%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Petlas Imperium PT515
30%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
67%
Dry driving behavior
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
74%
Petlas Imperium PT515
51%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
61%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Petlas Imperium PT515
75%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Petlas Imperium PT515
70%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
76%
Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
80%
Petlas Imperium PT515
90%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Interior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
Petlas Imperium PT515
81%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
81%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Petlas Imperium PT515
72%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Petlas Imperium PT515
75%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
82%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
72%
Fuel efficiency
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
89%
Petlas Imperium PT515
65%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2024205/55 R16View
ADACADAC
Summer
2023205/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2021205/55 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison