18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

The Kleber Dynaxer HP4 (by Kleber) and Hankook Ventus Prime 4 (by Hankook) are both summer tyres that can be compared based on their performances in various tyre tests.


The Kleber Dynaxer HP4 is designed for utmost comfort and minimal exterior noise, achieving a comfortable driving experience. With an overall user-rating of 76%, its best features are comfort and noise reduction. In the Autobild test, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 ranked 13 out of 21. The tyre's strengths included good mileage, excellent eco-balance, and excellent wear efficiency. However, its weaknesses were evident in unbalanced performance, especially on wet surfaces.


On the other hand, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4, a touring subtype tyre, scored an overall user rating of 81%. This tyre was found to be notably good for dry braking, dry handling, and wet braking. The Hankook Ventus Prime 4 also impressively ranked second place in the same Autobild test. Its strengths include superior traction on both dry and wet surfaces with some minor weaknesses including mild susceptibility to aquaplaning, along with some environmental and efficiency shortcomings.


Furthermore, in the ADAC test, out of 50 tyres tested, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 ranked 12th, whereas the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 ranked better at 9th position. Also in the Autobild 2022 test, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 showed commendable aquaplaning characteristics, short dry and wet braking distances, excellent driving comfort, and low rolling noise. However, its grip on wet surfaces was subpar, and it showed delayed steering response with understeering behaviour on dry tracks. Meanwhile, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 exhibited excellent dry and wet handling, short braking distances, good mileage, and a favorable price-to-performance ratio. However, comfort was merely average according to the test results.


To summarize, both the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 and Hankook Ventus Prime 4 are good summer tyre options. Despite their individual strengths and weaknesses, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 seems to perform better overall in the tests. The choice between the two would depend on the driver's preference for either comfort (Kleber Dynaxer HP4) or performance (Hankook Ventus Prime 4).

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Dunlop
SP Sport MAXX RT2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
11
13
26
10
Best position
#1
#2
#2
#2
Average position
11.6
6.2
7.5
6.0
Latest test
2024
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
121
530
101
104

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
82%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Vredestein ULTRAC
87%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
84%
Dunlop
SP Sport MAXX RT2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Wet Braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
96%
Vredestein ULTRAC
96%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
88%
Wet Handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
46%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
88%
Vredestein ULTRAC
88%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Wet Circle Cornering
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
88%
Vredestein ULTRAC
79%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
86%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
Vredestein ULTRAC
86%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
95%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Aquaplaning Cross
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
60%
Vredestein ULTRAC
87%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
60%
Dry Performance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
91%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Vredestein ULTRAC
77%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
69%
Dunlop
SP Sport MAXX RT2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Dry Braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
90%
Vredestein ULTRAC
79%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
90%
Dry Handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
59%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
92%
Vredestein ULTRAC
75%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
67%
Comfort & Noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
86%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
71%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Vredestein ULTRAC
67%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
72%
Dunlop
SP Sport MAXX RT2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Noise Exterior
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
86%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
Vredestein ULTRAC
57%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Ride Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
86%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
66%
Vredestein ULTRAC
76%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Economy
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
60%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
81%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Vredestein ULTRAC
49%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
56%
Dunlop
SP Sport MAXX RT2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
64%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Rolling Resistance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
59%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
84%
Vredestein ULTRAC
59%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
59%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
61%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Vredestein ULTRAC
38%
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2022215/55 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison