18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Cooper Zeon CS8 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Comparing the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 and the Cooper Zeon CS8 in independent summer-tyre tests shows a clear performance gap. Both are summer tyres, but their test results and overall ratings point to very different target customers and priorities.


Overall scores and test positions: the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 scores a strong 74% in our aggregated rating and placed consistently higher in major tyre comparisons (Autobild: 14th of 53; ADAC: 12th of 50). The Cooper Zeon CS8 sits much lower with a 34% rating and weaker placements (Autobild: 26th of 53; ADAC: 33rd of 50), so across mutual tests the Kleber is the better performer.


Strengths — Kleber Dynaxer HP4


  • Comfort and low exterior noise: Autobild highlighted ride comfort and quietness as standout attributes.

  • Durability and efficiency: Autobild 2024 praised its environmental balance, good tread life, abrasion resistance and efficiency — all important for long-term ownership costs.

  • Balanced everyday performance: Good overall ranking in both Autobild and ADAC implies reliable all-round behavior for typical summer driving.


Weaknesses — Kleber Dynaxer HP4


  • Not perfectly balanced: Autobild notes some weak points on wet roads that caused a small downgrade, so while competent, wet braking and hydroplaning margins are not class-leading.


Strengths — Cooper Zeon CS8


  • Wet grip: Cooper retains acceptable wet-road performance in Autobild, which is one of the few positive highlights.


Weaknesses — Cooper Zeon CS8


  • Poor dry performance: Autobild flagged significant shortcomings on dry roads, which led to downgrades and lower ranking.

  • Low longevity and sustainability: Major negative marks for environmental impact, low mileage, poor abrasion resistance and poor efficiency — translating to higher running costs and faster replacement.

  • Overall unbalanced behavior: Combined shortcomings make the tyre ill-suited for drivers who want predictable, economical summer performance.


Head-to-head verdict: in direct comparison the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 is clearly superior for most buyers. It delivers quieter, more comfortable driving, better durability and a stronger environmental/efficiency profile — all reflected by higher test rankings and a 74% aggregate score. The Cooper Zeon CS8 may still be acceptable if wet grip is your only priority, but its serious deficits on dry roads, low tread life and poor environmental marks make it hard to recommend except in niche situations.


Neither tyre is listed as being replaced by a newer model in our data, so you can consider these test results current for the referenced versions. For more details visit the manufacturer pages: Kleber (manufacturer) and Cooper (manufacturer).

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Cooper
Zeon CS8
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
11
14
3
15
Best position
#1
#9
#2
#2
Average position
11.6
19.7
3.3
9.0
Latest test
2024
2024
2026
2025
Available sizes
121
145
40
225

Wet

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Cooper Zeon CS8
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Cooper Zeon CS8
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Cooper Zeon CS8
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Cooper Zeon CS8
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Cooper Zeon CS8
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Cooper Zeon CS8
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Wet performance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Cooper Zeon CS8
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Cooper Zeon CS8
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Cooper Zeon CS8
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Dry performance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry driving behavior
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Interior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Cooper Zeon CS8
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Cooper Zeon CS8
49%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Cooper Zeon CS8
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Price/value
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Cooper Zeon CS8
43%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Fuel efficiency
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison