18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun vs. Nokian Powerproof

The Kleber Dynaxer HP4 and the Bridgestone Turanza T005 represent two high-performing summer tyres from leading manufacturers Kleber and Bridgestone. This comparison review brings together data from multiple tyre tests to help you make an informed choice.


The Kleber Dynaxer HP4 scored an 82% rating in our tests, making it a reliable pick. It shines in exterior noise, delivering a smooth, quiet ride. However, critiques from Autobild and ADAC tests referenced its slower steering response and limited grip in wet conditions as areas for improvement. A highlight from our tests was good aquaplaning characteristics, with additional positives being good comfort and short dry and wet braking distances.


Moving onto the Bridgestone Turanza T005, this tyre excels in many areas, earning an impressive 89% rating in our tests. Outstanding features include its excellent dry and wet handling, high grip, and precise steering. It placed 4th out of 17 in the ADAC test, outperforming the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 which obtained the 11th rank. In terms of shortcomings, reports from Autobild and ADAC tests indicated a slightly increased tyre wear.


Based on test positions, Bridgestone's Turanza T005 consistently ranked higher than the Kleber Dynaxer HP4. However, the Dynaxer HP4's strengths in short braking distances and quieter exterior noise mean it is not to be completely overlooked. It's important to consider your individual driving conditions and requirements when choosing the best tyre.


In conclusion, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 offers an overall higher performance, presenting better grip, and improved handling in both dry and wet conditions. While the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 trails somewhat in overall performance- it does offer considerable advantages in terms of noise reduction and comfort.


While each tyre presents its own strengths and weaknesses, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 is the overall winner in direct comparison, meeting a wider range of requirements for summer driving. However, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 still stands as a viable choice for drivers prioritizing comfort and noise reduction.

Test Profile

Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Nokian
Powerproof
Number of tests
11
33
10
23
11
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#2
#2
Average position
11.6
4.1
6.0
6.6
7.5
Latest test
2024
2025
2026
2025
2022
Available sizes
121
658
104
194
53

Wet

Wet
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Nokian Powerproof
80%
Wet braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Nokian Powerproof
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
85%
Nokian Powerproof
72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
85%
Nokian Powerproof
81%
Wet handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
68%
Nokian Powerproof
86%
Wet circle cornering
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Nokian Powerproof
82%
Wet side guide
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
84%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
65%
Nokian Powerproof
79%
Wet performance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
Nokian Powerproof
77%

Dry

Dry
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
77%
Nokian Powerproof
83%
Dry braking
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
77%
Nokian Powerproof
88%
Dry handling
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
78%
Nokian Powerproof
84%
Dry performance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Nokian Powerproof
72%
Dry driving behavior
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
74%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
89%
Nokian Powerproof
66%

Comfort

Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Nokian Powerproof
76%
Exterior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Nokian Powerproof
64%
Comfort
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
70%
Interior noise
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
67%
Nokian Powerproof
80%

Costs

Costs
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
64%
Nokian Powerproof
65%
Mileage
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
70%
Nokian Powerproof
54%
Rolling resistance
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
55%
Nokian Powerproof
70%
Price/value
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Nokian Powerproof
50%
Fuel efficiency
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
89%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
86%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
78%
Nokian Powerproof
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2022215/55 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2022215/55 R17View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison