18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Hifly All-Transit vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Hifly
All-Transit
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
10
4
3
Best position
#7
#2
#3
#2
Average position
7.0
6.0
12.0
3.7
Latest test
2020
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
16
109
111
36

Snow

Snow
Hifly All-Transit
63%

Wet

Wet
Hifly All-Transit
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Hifly All-Transit
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Hifly All-Transit
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Hifly All-Transit
55%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Hifly All-Transit
50%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Comfort

Comfort
Hifly All-Transit
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Hifly All-Transit
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Hifly All-Transit
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Hifly All-Transit
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Hifly All-Transit
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Costs

Costs
Hifly All-Transit
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Hifly All-Transit
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison