18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 (2026)

Hankook wins every shared test; Nexen suits tight budgets and light winter conditions only.

These two South Korean winter tyres occupy very different positions in the market. The Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 is an established upper-middle-segment performer with a broad size range spanning R13 to R17, while the Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 is a budget-oriented tyre available in a single R13 dimension — making this less a rivalry between equals and more a question of what you're willing to trade away for price. Across five shared group tests, the Hankook finished ahead in every single one. The gap is real, consistent, and worth understanding before you buy.

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
Good for
Drivers prioritising wet and ice safety Winter commuters needing confident all-round grip Those wanting strong aquaplaning resistance Buyers upgrading from basic budget winter tyres
Not ideal for
Drivers needing R18+ fitments Those prioritising maximum tread longevity
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
Good for
Budget-conscious R13 wheel owners Light winter use on cleared or slushy roads Drivers prioritising tread longevity over peak grip City drivers in mild winter climates
Not ideal for
Drivers needing sizes beyond R13 Those requiring strong aquaplaning protection Anyone prioritising wet braking safety Drivers in demanding ice or deep snow conditions

Test Profile

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452
Nexen
Winguard Snow G WH2
Number of tests
21
7
Best position
#2
#6
Average position
7.1
14.0
Latest test
2021
2018
Available sizes
72
64

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Dry
Confidence
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
100%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
97%
Dry braking
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
100%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
100%
Dry driving behavior
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
100%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
97%
Dry handling
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
100%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
90%
Dry handling - objective
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
100%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
100%
Dry lane changing
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
100%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
100%
Safety
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
100%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
97%
Dry steering response
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
100%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
80%

On dry roads the Hankook holds a clear advantage. Its dry braking and handling scores are meaningfully stronger, and in direct test comparisons the Winguard consistently trailed — finishing 21st versus the Hankook's 4th in a 51-tyre AutoBild group, and 37th versus 14th in a separate 50-tyre field. The Hankook's dry handling character is confident and progressive, inspiring driver trust. The Nexen is not unmanageable — owners of the WH2 regularly report decent dry grip for a budget tyre — but it simply lacks the composure and stopping authority of the Hankook in this discipline.

Wet
Confidence
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
100%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
100%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
40%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
100%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
60%
Wet braking
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
100%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
100%
Wet circle cornering
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
90%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
100%
Wet handling
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
100%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
70%
Wet handling - objective
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
100%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
90%

Wet performance is where the gap becomes most significant. Averaged across two measured braking tests, the Hankook stops in 37.0m versus 39.8m for the Nexen — a difference of nearly 3 metres that matters considerably in real emergencies. In the 2018 AutoBild test alone, the Nexen needed 36.8m to the Hankook's 34.9m. More concerning is the Nexen's aquaplaning resistance, which scores a low 53.5 against the Hankook's 89.7 — a substantial deficit suggesting the Nexen can lose traction quickly in standing water. Wet handling is similarly weaker. The Hankook's EU wet grip label reaches B in some fitments; the Nexen carries no EU label data at all for its sole available size.

Snow
Confidence
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
100%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
90%
Snow braking
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
100%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
100%
Snow cornering
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
100%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
100%
Snow handling
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
100%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
80%
Snow handling - objective
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
100%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
80%
Snow traction
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
100%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
90%

Snow is where the Nexen closes the gap most convincingly, and real owners frequently praise its winter traction — one BMW 218d driver was genuinely impressed with its performance through Romanian winter slush and 10cm snowfall. In the 2018 AutoBild test, snow braking measured 27.7m for the Hankook versus 29.4m for the Nexen — respectable for a budget tyre. Snow traction and handling scores are also solid for the WH2. That said, the Hankook remains the stronger all-round winter performer with snow scores of 90.1 versus 79.9, and its ice grip is particularly well regarded. For pure budget winter driving in light snow conditions, the Nexen punches above its price; for anything more demanding, the Hankook's advantage reasserts itself.

Ice
Confidence
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
100%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
98%
Ice lateral guidance
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
100%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
98%
Comfort
Confidence
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
100%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
100%
Comfort
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
100%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
100%
Exterior noise
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
100%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
100%
Interior noise
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
93%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
100%

Neither tyre is a luxury cruiser, but the Hankook edges the comfort comparison. Owners consistently mention low noise as a highlight, and the tyre's interior refinement holds up well. The Nexen's story is more mixed: early in its life it is impressively quiet, but several owners note that noise increases noticeably after the first 5,000–10,000 km. Rolling resistance is modest on both tyres, though neither earns strong efficiency marks — the Hankook's EU fuel label sits predominantly at E. The Nexen's standout metric is mileage, scoring 89 versus the Hankook's 76.8, suggesting the budget tyre wears more slowly — though a minority of owners have reported the opposite experience.

Costs
Confidence
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
100%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
100%
Fuel efficiency
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
100%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
95%
Mileage
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
95%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
100%
Price/value
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
89%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
100%
Rolling resistance
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
100%
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
90%

Verdict

The Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 is the clear choice for anyone who wants a genuinely capable winter tyre with reliable wet braking, strong aquaplaning resistance, and consistent test results across multiple independent evaluations. It has since been succeeded by the Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3, so pricing on the RS2 may be attractive as stock clears. The Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2 is a narrow proposition — literally, given it comes in one size — best suited to cost-sensitive buyers fitting small R13 wheels who drive primarily in light winter conditions and value mileage over peak wet-weather safety. If aquaplaning or emergency wet braking are concerns, the Hankook is the only sensible answer here.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutoMotorSportAutoMotorSport
Winter
2018205/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2018195/65 R15View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2016205/55 R16View
GTÜGTÜ
Winter
2016205/55 R16View
ADACADAC
Winter
2016185/65 R15View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.