18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

The Hankook Ventus Prime 4 and the Firestone Roadhawk are two summer tyres worth noting in your comparison. Each one has its own strengths and weaknesses. Understanding their performance in independent tests will enable you to make the best purchasing decision.


The Hankook Ventus Prime 4 succeeded the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125, improving upon its predecessor's features. In our rating, it garnered a high score of 81%. The Hankook Ventus Prime 4 excels in dry braking, dry handling, and wet braking, as seen in the Autobild tests where it ranked 2nd out of 51 tyres. However, it displayed some weaknesses concerning aquaplaning and efficiency, according to autozeitung 2018 tests. Despite this, it still shows excellent handling on both dry and wet surfaces. Please note, it has an average comfort level according to the autobild 2022 test. Check for the full review on the Hankook's site.


In contrast, the Firestone Roadhawk, manufactured by Firestone, scored a bit lower in our rating, attaining 59%. This tyre displayed outstanding performance on dry surfaces and boasted efficiency and lightness. Drawbacks include a lack of balance and poor performance on wet surfaces, resulting in a downgrade in several tests. Moreover, its lifespan leaves something to be desired. As seen in the ADAC testing, it ranked 20th out of 50, whereas it ranked 30th out of 51 in the Autobild tests, significantly lower than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.


Summing up, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 outperforms the Firestone Roadhawk in most of the tested criteria and rankings. Hankook offers better braking and handling skills, especially in wet conditions, which is significant for summer tyres. It's the obvious pick if considering the two's performances in mutual tests. However, note that Firestone Roadhawk does score significantly higher when it comes to efficiency and is remarkably lighter.


Overall, both are intriguing options depending on your driving preferences and conditions-Prioritize safety and wet surface performance with Hankook, but consider Firestone if low weight and efficiency are crucial for you.

Test Profile

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
13
21
3
3
5
Best position
#2
#2
#2
#2
#1
Average position
6.2
11.9
3.3
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2026
2024
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
530
164
40
34
63

Wet

Wet
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet braking
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
59%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet circle cornering
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet handling
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Interior noise
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%

Offroad

Offroad
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Dry

Dry
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Costs

Costs
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Price/value
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison