Comparison: Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Upper-middle

Hankook

ION FlexClimate

VS

Also compare with

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

ION FlexClimate

Quatrac Pro EV

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Number of tests

1

10

4

Best position

#1

#3

#2

Average position

1.0

3.0

6.0

3.3

Latest test

2025

2026

Available sizes

27

18

109

40

Wet

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Wet handling

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Aquaplaning - cross

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Wet braking

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

57%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Snow

Hankook ION FlexClimate

75%

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

62%

Comfort

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Comfort

Hankook ION FlexClimate

74%

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Exterior noise

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Dry

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

65%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Dry braking

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Dry handling

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Costs

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Rolling resistance

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Best tyres on snow Tyres for EV cars Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV vs Maxxis Premitra AS AP3

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV vs Falken e.Ziex

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV vs Avon ZV7

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kumho Ecsta HS51

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Browse by brand

Comparison: Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION FlexClimate

Quatrac Pro EV

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison