18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Triangle
EffeX SUV TS 601
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
1
10
3
Best position
#1
#8
#2
#2
Average position
1.0
8.0
6.0
3.7
Latest test
2025
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
27
109
36

Wet

Wet
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Snow

Snow
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601
54%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Costs

Costs
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Triangle EffeX SUV TS 601
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison