18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
1
4
18
2
4
3
28
Best position
#1
#3
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
1.0
12.0
6.1
2.0
3.3
3.7
2.3
Latest test
2025
2025
2024
2025
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
27
111
47
48
40
36
67

Wet

Wet
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet handling
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Wet braking
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%

Snow

Snow
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
76%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Comfort
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Exterior noise
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%

Dry

Dry
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%

Costs

Costs
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolling resistance
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison