18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
1
4
18
4
4
3
3
Best position
#1
#3
#1
#2
#2
#2
#1
Average position
1.0
12.0
6.1
3.3
3.3
3.7
1.3
Latest test
2025
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
27
111
47
40
40
36
23

Wet

Wet
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Wet handling
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Wet braking
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%

Snow

Snow
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Comfort
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Exterior noise
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%

Dry

Dry
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Dry braking
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Dry handling
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%

Costs

Costs
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Rolling resistance
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison