18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
5
15
3
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#2
Average position
1.0
2.8
9.0
3.7
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
27
139
226
36

Wet

Wet
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Snow

Snow
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Costs

Costs
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison