18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
1
18
4
3
5
3
4
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#1
#1
#2
#2
Average position
1.0
6.1
3.3
1.3
2.2
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
27
47
40
23
63
36
40

Wet

Wet
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Wet handling
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Snow

Snow
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Comfort
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry braking
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Costs

Costs
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison