Comparison: Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Falken EuroWinter HS02 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Upper-middle

Hankook

ION FlexClimate

VS

Also compare with

Cinturato (C3)

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato P7 C2

Test Profile

ION FlexClimate

EuroWinter HS02

Blizzak 6

Ecsta HS52

Number of tests

1

4

14

10

Best position

#1

#7

#1

#2

Average position

1.0

12.3

3.6

6.0

Latest test

2025

2026

Available sizes

27

103

194

109

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Wet braking

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Wet handling

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Snow

Hankook ION FlexClimate

75%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Snow braking

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

80%

Snow handling

Hankook ION FlexClimate

71%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

57%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Snow traction

Hankook ION FlexClimate

76%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Dry

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Dry braking

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Dry handling

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Comfort

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Exterior noise

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Comfort

Hankook ION FlexClimate

74%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

63%

Costs

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Falken EuroWinter HS02

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Rolling resistance

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Browse by brand

Comparison: Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Falken EuroWinter HS02 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

ION FlexClimate

EuroWinter HS02

Blizzak 6

Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison