Segment
1. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Lowcost2. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo). Generally, Apollo winter tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than GT (50%). In this particular case, the GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo has a better rating of 61% compared to 60% of the Apollo Alnac 4G Winter. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Radial Winter Pro 2 evo and the Alnac 4G Winter were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo
| Apollo Alnac 4G Winter
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R13 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Lowcost2. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Lowcost
2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Satisfactory
2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 3+ | 3 | |||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo | 36.0 | 29.3 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Winter | 36.4 | 30.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||