18 shops · 56 ·847+ products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: GT radial Sport Active vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 (2026)

GT radial Sport ActiveBudget
GTGT

radial Sport Active

R17 – R19
VS
Continental PremiumContact 6Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 6

8.3
R15 – R22
Also compare with
Turanza T005 Ecsta PS71 Victra Sport 5
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than GT (67%). The first tyre test of GT radial Sport Active was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Continental PremiumContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the radial Sport Active and the PremiumContact 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below.

Test Profile

GT
radial Sport Active
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Number of tests
3
36
Best position
#12
#1
Average position
28.3
3.1
Latest test
2020
2023
Available sizes
18
318

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Wet braking
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Wet handling
Continental PremiumContact 6
88%
Wet circle cornering
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Wet side guide
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Wet performance
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Dry
Confidence
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Dry braking
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Dry handling
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Dry driving behavior
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Dry steering response
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Dry lane changing
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Dry performance
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Comfort
Confidence
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Exterior noise
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Interior noise
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Offroad
Confidence
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%
Costs
Confidence
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Rolling resistance
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Mileage
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Fuel efficiency
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Price/value
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2020245/45 R18View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2019225/45 R17View

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVsBest dry-handling tyresBest rain tyresBest handling tyresQuietest tyresMost economical tyresBest anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

GT radial Sport Active vs Falken Azenis FK510GT radial Sport Active vs Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2GT radial Sport Active vs Pirelli P ZEROGT radial Sport Active vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Falken Azenis FK510Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

Browse by brand

MichelinPirelliHankookGoodyearNokianContinentalVredesteinNexenFalkenKumhoDunlopMaxxis

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.