18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Falken e.Ziex

GT Radial FE2 vs Vredestein Ultrac – two popular summer choices with different priorities. This comparison pulls together the latest independent test data to help you decide which tyre fits your needs for safety, efficiency, and value.


Tyre overview


Head-to-head in independent tests


  • Autobild (55 tyres): Vredestein Ultrac P3 vs GT Radial FE2 P19. The Ultrac consistently excelled in wet handling, wet circle, dry handling, and both longitudinal and lateral aquaplaning, while the FE2 landed mid‑pack overall.

  • Autobild 2024 qualitative notes:

    • GT Radial FE2: Pros – good wet and dry handling with a pleasing balance; low rolling resistance. Consextended wet braking; average aquaplaning resistance.

    • Vredestein Ultrac: Prosexcellent dynamics, short wet and dry braking, very good aquaplaning safety. Cons – lower projected mileage; elevated rolling resistance.



  • TyreReviews.com 2023: Ultrac again highlighted for excellent wet handling and the best aquaplaning resistance on test, with good dry braking; trade‑offs include high rolling resistance and higher external noise.


What the data says
If you prioritise wet‑road safety and dynamic grip, the Vredestein Ultrac is the stronger performer across multiple categories and tests, regularly scoring near the top for wet handling, braking, and aquaplaning. Its main compromises are efficiency (rolling resistance), potential wear/longevity, and noise.
The GT Radial FE2 impresses with a balanced feel and low rolling resistance—useful for fuel economy—and delivers competent dry and wet handling. However, it loses ground in critical safety metrics like wet braking distance and aquaplaning resistance, which explains its mid‑field overall placement against a large field.


Verdict: which tyre is better overall?
Based on mutual test results, the Vredestein Ultrac is the overall winner, particularly for drivers who encounter frequent rain or value strong braking and confidence at the limit. Choose the GT Radial FE2 if your priorities lean toward efficiency and balanced everyday manners at a likely lower price point, and you’re willing to trade some wet‑safety headroom.


Model lifecycle: Neither tyre is listed as replaced by a newer model at this time.

Test Profile

Gt
Radial Fe2
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
3
Best position
#2
Average position
3.7
Latest test
2025
Available sizes
34

Wet

Wet
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
Vredestein ULTRAC
93%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Gt Radial Fe2
69%
Vredestein ULTRAC
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Vredestein ULTRAC
88%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
Vredestein ULTRAC
85%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
82%
Vredestein ULTRAC
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Gt Radial Fe2
74%
Vredestein ULTRAC
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Gt Radial Fe2
79%
Vredestein ULTRAC
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Gt Radial Fe2
75%
Vredestein ULTRAC
82%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Gt Radial Fe2
80%
Vredestein ULTRAC
86%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Gt Radial Fe2
71%
Vredestein ULTRAC
83%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Costs

Costs
Gt Radial Fe2
67%
Vredestein ULTRAC
56%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Gt Radial Fe2
65%
Vredestein ULTRAC
67%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Gt Radial Fe2
72%
Vredestein ULTRAC
29%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison