18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

GT Radial FE2 vs Vredestein Ultrac – two popular summer choices with different priorities. This comparison pulls together the latest independent test data to help you decide which tyre fits your needs for safety, efficiency, and value.


Tyre overview


Head-to-head in independent tests


  • Autobild (55 tyres): Vredestein Ultrac P3 vs GT Radial FE2 P19. The Ultrac consistently excelled in wet handling, wet circle, dry handling, and both longitudinal and lateral aquaplaning, while the FE2 landed mid‑pack overall.

  • Autobild 2024 qualitative notes:

    • GT Radial FE2: Pros – good wet and dry handling with a pleasing balance; low rolling resistance. Consextended wet braking; average aquaplaning resistance.

    • Vredestein Ultrac: Prosexcellent dynamics, short wet and dry braking, very good aquaplaning safety. Cons – lower projected mileage; elevated rolling resistance.



  • TyreReviews.com 2023: Ultrac again highlighted for excellent wet handling and the best aquaplaning resistance on test, with good dry braking; trade‑offs include high rolling resistance and higher external noise.


What the data says
If you prioritise wet‑road safety and dynamic grip, the Vredestein Ultrac is the stronger performer across multiple categories and tests, regularly scoring near the top for wet handling, braking, and aquaplaning. Its main compromises are efficiency (rolling resistance), potential wear/longevity, and noise.
The GT Radial FE2 impresses with a balanced feel and low rolling resistance—useful for fuel economy—and delivers competent dry and wet handling. However, it loses ground in critical safety metrics like wet braking distance and aquaplaning resistance, which explains its mid‑field overall placement against a large field.


Verdict: which tyre is better overall?
Based on mutual test results, the Vredestein Ultrac is the overall winner, particularly for drivers who encounter frequent rain or value strong braking and confidence at the limit. Choose the GT Radial FE2 if your priorities lean toward efficiency and balanced everyday manners at a likely lower price point, and you’re willing to trade some wet‑safety headroom.


Model lifecycle: Neither tyre is listed as replaced by a newer model at this time.

Test Profile

Gt
Radial Fe2
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Number of tests
Best position
Average position
Latest test
Available sizes

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Gt Radial Fe2
66%
Gt
Radial Fe2
Vredestein ULTRAC
91%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Wet Braking
Gt Radial Fe2
64%
Vredestein ULTRAC
82%
Wet Handling
Gt Radial Fe2
67%
Vredestein ULTRAC
92%
Wet Circle Cornering
Gt Radial Fe2
67%
Vredestein ULTRAC
92%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Gt Radial Fe2
66%
Vredestein ULTRAC
95%
Aquaplaning Cross
Gt Radial Fe2
66%
Vredestein ULTRAC
95%
Dry Performance
Gt Radial Fe2
66%
Gt
Radial Fe2
Vredestein ULTRAC
87%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Dry Braking
Gt Radial Fe2
71%
Vredestein ULTRAC
81%
Dry Handling
Gt Radial Fe2
61%
Vredestein ULTRAC
92%
Comfort & Noise
Gt Radial Fe2
73%
Gt
Radial Fe2
Vredestein ULTRAC
73%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Noise Exterior
Gt Radial Fe2
73%
Vredestein ULTRAC
73%
Economy
Gt Radial Fe2
70%
Gt
Radial Fe2
Vredestein ULTRAC
46%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Rolling Resistance
Gt Radial Fe2
67%
Vredestein ULTRAC
59%
Mileage
Gt Radial Fe2
73%
Vredestein ULTRAC
32%

Performance spider chart

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2024205/55 R16View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison