18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test Profile

GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Number of tests
3
6
7
Best position
#5
#3
#1
Average position
7.3
4.7
2.4
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
59
146
137

Wet

Wet
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
92%
Wet braking
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
90%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
94%
Wet circle cornering
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
91%
Wet handling
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
87%

Snow

Snow
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
73%

Costs

Costs
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
64%
Rolling resistance
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
66%

Comfort

Comfort
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
63%
Exterior noise
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
71%
Comfort
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
72%

Dry

Dry
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
86%
Dry braking
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
84%
Dry handling
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
91%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison