Segment
1. Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport Lowcost2. Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 Lowcost
Comparison: Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport vs. Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Gripmax) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen). Generally, Nexen summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Gripmax (30%). In this particular case, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 has a better rating of 64% compared to 40% of the Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport. The first tyre test of Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport was done in 2023, compared to 2025 when was the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2025 295/30 R20 test, where both the SuperGrip Pro Sport and the N Fera Sport SU2 were tested.
| # | Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport
| Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | |||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
